Assalamualaikum, 6.0 TM(note: an anti hadeeth exponent) renounced “wau atfa” completely. He says that the “wau” between “al kitab” and “al hikmah” does not differentiate between “al kitab” and “al hikmah”. They both can mean the same. TRUTH: When God says “Wasyamsi wa dhuhaha” is God saying that “the Sun” is the same as “the dusk” (in verse 91:01) ? Does TM assumes that "Asy Syams" is the same as "Ad Dhuha"
In this article, i'd like to provide some guide on how to face people of the anti-hadeeth sect. I have prepared a guide that will, inshaalah, provide an argument resolver thus automatically rendering the anti hadeeth people pointless
Guide #1 : Always insists on their explanation of the verse 16:44 of the Quran,
meaning:(We sent them) with Clear Signs and Books of dark prophecies; and We have sent down unto thee (also) the Message; that thou mayest explain clearly to men what is sent for them, and that they may give thought.
JUSTIFICATION: THe Anti HAdeeth argues that the Quran is complete and in need of no external source. You will find that the Anti Hadeeth will never quote 16:44. In fact, their prophet, Rashad Khalifa tries to change the meaning of this verse.
In short, this verse provides tha last nail in the coffin of the Anti Hadeeth sect/belief structure
Guide #2 : Always tell them that Allah SWT has never said that the Quran is His only Revelations to the people of Muhammad SAW. Proof 62:02
meaning:It is He Who has sent amongst the Unlettered an apostle from among themselves, to rehearse to them His Signs, to sanctify them, and to instruct them in Scripture and Wisdom,- although they had been, before, in manifest error;-
EXPLANATION: Here God says that the Prophet is to teach the Quran and Al Hikmah to his people. THe Quran is clear but what about Al Hikmah? Al Hikmah is contained in the Al HAdeeth of the Prophet SAW.
So this verse indicates that there is more than one Revelations from God to the people of Mohd.
Guide #3 : Ask them these questions -
a. Where does it say in the Quran that Surah Al Baqarah must come after Al Fatihah?
b. Where does it say in the Quran that Surah An Nas (Qulauzubirabinnas) must be the last Surah (chapter) in the Quran?
c. Where does it say in the Quran that there are 30 “juz”(section)?
d. Where does it say in the Quran that “alhamdulillahirabilalamin(01:01)” must come before
“Ar Rahman Ar Rahim(01:02)”?
e. Where does it say in the Quran that there must be 114 Surah (Chapters) in the Quran?
f. Where does it say in the Quran that“Qulhuwallahuahad (112:01) must come before “Allahusamad(112:02)?
WHY?: Because to this date, the Anti Hadeeth sect cannot explain to us how the Quran reached us from the Prophet SAW. Their answers are either vauge, or in void of any specific detail. THey merely quote a few passages from the Quran, but they cannot provide any specifics despite quoting the verses.
GUIDE #4: Tell them that their Quran is from the planet Uranus and make them refer to this link (http://antiantihadeeth.blogspot.com/2007/07/anti-hadeeths-quran-is-from-planet_15.html)
WHY?: Because their Quran is not the Quran that's sent down to the Prophet SAW. Their Quran is their own whimsical interpretation of the TRANSLATION of the Quran. Nothing more.
Guide#5:A sample of Anti Hadeeth abject stupidity
See how ignorant the Anti Hadeeth sect is? They change the meaning of the Quran and they say that it's their Quran that's correct
GUIDE #6: Ask them why they reject the Arabic Quran and instead accept the English and Malay Quran?
They mostly depend on translations and nothing else. If they understood the Quran in Arabic, there will be no Anti Hadeeth at all.
GUIDE #7: Tell them, there is no such thing as "Traditional Islam". There is only one ISlam. Other than that one Islam, there is only deviation. Their sect belongs to the deviated category and they are not part of Islam.
6.0 TM(note: an anti hadeeth exponent) renounced “wau atfa” completely. He says that the “wau” between “al kitab” and “al hikmah” does not differentiate between “al kitab” and “al hikmah”. They both can mean the same.
TRUTH: When God says “Wasyamsi wa dhuhaha” is God saying that “the Sun” is the same as “the dusk” (in verse 91:01) ? Does TM assumes that "Asy Syams" is the same as "Ad Dhuha"(end)